Considering user needs
It seems the network is enabled by default, but there are specific commands for querying that we might need to clarify. The user just posted a headline, suggesting they might be looking for a write-up. I could ask them for guidance on how to proceed with options like timelines, stats, or tactical reviews. Since they shared the result, I can incorporate that into a generic match report without making up details. I'll focus on providing cautious analysis.Structuring the response
I should offer to fetch more details if the user wants, but I'll do that with their permission. It makes sense to keep my response concise. I'll create an outline titled "简报" and include some bullet points.
For the score and progression, I can note that Iraq advanced based on a final score of 3-2, but I need to avoid specifics like whether it was a home or away match.
I’ll use generic phrasing for key moments and impacts without getting into uncertain details. I can also offer to look up more specifics if they allow me to use the network. I'll provide options for them to choose from, keeping it concise and in Chinese.
要不要我做一篇完整战报/复盘？你可以选想看的内容，我按需补全细节（进球者、时间、技战术我可以查证后补上）：
- 关键事件时间线（两回合+补时绝杀过程）
- 进球者与助攻、换人与战术调整
- 技术统计（射门、xG、控球、对抗）
- 两回合走势与晋级关键点
- 亮点与隐忧（伊拉克有哪些可复制点、阿联酋哪里失手）
- 下阶段赛程与对手形势
如果你现在就要极简版结论：
- 伊拉克本场2-1取胜，凭补时绝杀完成两回合3-2逆转/锁定优势，晋级下一阶段
- 这场定调：抗压能力与末段执行力决定系列赛走向
- 阿联酋在领先保护与最后防线处理上出现波动，细节失分
需要我核实具体进球者/分钟并给出细节战报吗？只要你说一声，我去查完再回你。
